Last
update: November 19, 2003 at 3:24 PM
Cutting the phone cord: Who and how fast?
Steve
Alexander, Star
Tribune
November 12, 2003 CELL12
First
published on Nov. 12, 2003.
Now that consumers can keep
their phone numbers if they leave either their wired or wireless service
providers, the question is how many people will actually do it.
Starting Nov. 24, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) has given the green light to two forms of
"number portability" in the 100 largest metro markets:
• Traditional phone users can
cut the cord and switch to a wireless phone without giving up their home phone
number.
• Disgruntled wireless
customers can switch cell phone companies and take their numbers along.
Analysts say millions of people
are likely to do both -- but maybe not right away.
It may take months for many
customers to change wireless companies and perhaps years for many traditional
phone customers to make the leap to wireless, they say.
Many consumers with wired
phones may never switch because they like features that today are unique to
wired phones, such as the ability to have many phone extensions sharing a
single number or the ability for 911 calls to be traced to a specific location.
Businesses, which have much
invested in wire lines and can buy wire-based services in bulk, will have
little incentive to switch to wireless, said Cheryl O'Brien, president of
consulting firm Technology Management Corp. in Shorewood.
In the long run,
wired-to-wireless number portability seems likely to help the wireless industry
because its potential customer base has been greatly expanded.
"It does help wireless
companies get new customers," said Allan Keiter,
president of
MyRatePlan.com, an Atlanta firm that helps
consumers compare wireless phone plans in their own
cities. "In the short run, it will still be painful for wireless companies
because adding new customers costs them more than they initially earn. That's
because they are paying a subsidy for the phone and paying a retailer to
activate a customer."
The ability to lure new
customers from traditional phones to wireless ones could help cell phone
companies survive while they fight it out among themselves over wireless number
portability. New cell customers could help alleviate high customer turnover, or
churn, that averages 30 percent annually in the cell phone business. Analysts
say churn will only get worse as existing wireless customers hop from one cell
service to another in search of a better deal.
Companies such as Qwest don't
benefit from the FCC's rule because number portability in reverse -- wireless
to traditional phone -- wasn't required by the FCC.
In what some analysts
interpreted as a hint that it might challenge the FCC's new portability rule in
court, Qwest calls the rule unfair.
"This is a one-way street
that will leave millions of customers stranded without the ability to convert
wireless numbers to wire-line," Qwest said. "Millions of customers
prefer the security and quality of a wire-line telephone."
Qwest's negative reaction
"is an indication that there is a certain amount of pent-up demand for the
transition from wired telephones to wireless ones," said Cory Jackson, an
analyst at U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray.
"The transfer to wireless
will be appealing to some because it is a cheaper alternative considering that
long-distance is included," Jackson
said. "Those who are considering switching from wired to wireless phones
won't even be concerned about things like 911 service or multiple telephone
extensions."
But not all traditional phone
companies are equally hurt. Verizon, which is both a
wired phone company on the East Coast as well as a wireless company in many
parts of the nation, might not actually lose its East Coast wired phone
customers so much as move them from its wired side to its wireless side.
The picture for Qwest is not as
bright. The company owns its traditional wired phone service but re-markets
Sprint wireless service under the Qwest Wireless name. As a result, shifting a
customer from Qwest wired phone service to Qwest wireless is likely to make
that customer less profitable for the company, Jackson said.